|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by sachacrompton,
déc. 2, 2007
Pros: High speed, high volume printer/copier with many functions
Cons: Cheaper build quality than the older model Officejet 9110. No real problems so far.
The Bottom Line: If you want a high volume, high speed printer and copier with low running costs, this is the machine to get.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by denverwade,
nov. 21, 2007
Pros: easy of use, does everything perfect
Cons: none
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by Bradman,
avr. 18, 2008
Pros: Fast! Great print quality. Lots of features
Cons: Big and noisy
The Bottom Line: Lots of features and a great print engine.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by will310,
juin 27, 2007
Pros: I like the professional appearance along with the features and many options.
Cons: The wireless connect lockup on initial activation and tech support is no help.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by manleyopinions,
févr. 21, 2008
Pros: All-in-one
Cons: We're on our 3rd one in 6 months
The Bottom Line: We would definitely not purchase again. We are on our 3rd one in six months.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by vliscony,
juin 17, 2007
Pros: Reasonable Speed, print quality, dual-sided, economical (when it works)
Cons: Inaccuracies in printing, some paper handling problems. Frequent breakdowns
The Bottom Line: My problems are hopefully the exception. It is overall an appealing product for cheap drafts, and letters, etc. Simple, basic day to day use because it's economical and fast.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
|
by janeboynton,
sept. 4, 2007
Pros: I wanted an all in one
Cons: I wanted it to work
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Paper Handling: |
|
|
by joshwallner,
oct. 15, 2007
Pros: It's not too big to be carried to the city dump by hand.
Cons: Fifteen words is not enough.
|
|